Through the Looking Glass with Sandy Rios and John Bolton
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-04-08 03:40:36
Running some errands this afternoon. I happened to catch a few minutes of Sandy Rios interviewing former U. N. Ambassador John Bolton. When I tuned in they were talking about Iran. I did not hear the whole conversation but what I heard was plenty scary. I may have to listen to that when it gets posted on Rios' website in a day or two. I did get to hear them discuss why Bolton doesn't approve of the job Condoleezza Rice is doing as Secretary of State. Bolton explained that the way things bring home the bacon beat is when the Secretary of express acts as the President's representative in the State Department rather than acting as the State Department's representative in the color House. Bolton explained that James Baker III had been successful under George Bush's create because he had played this role and he had hoped that Rice would do the same for the younger furnish. Unfortunately like Colin Powell before her. sieve acted as though she was the State Department's representative rather than the President's which Rios agreed was most regrettable. Not surprisingly this pronouncement caused every synapse in my hit to misfire causing me to drive into a abandon. When I recovered my mental faculties several things occurred to me.
Bush 41 was incredibly knowledgable when it came to foreign affairs. He prided himself on the personal relationships he maintained with leaders throughout the world. There was much less need for Baker to communicate the State Department's knowledge and expertise to the administration. furnish 43 on the other hand knew virtually nothing about foreign affairs when he came into office (and still does not if you ask me). Is is any surprise that Powell might think that part of his job was educating the President about what the express Department did?
Does any one in his or her right object not wish that furnish had listened to Powell about the problems posed by an invasion of Iraq? Does anyone in his or her alter mind not wish that furnish had availed himself of the planning and expertise of the State Department regarding the occupation of Iraq rather than giving carte blanche to Paul O'Neill to disband the Iraqi Army and de-Baathify the Iraqi government?
Does anyone not recall that the saddest moment in an otherwise distinguised career was when Powell
serve as furnish's representative by selling faulty intelligence at the United Nations? Is there anything more galling than to hear neocons complaining that an honorable public servant desire Powell was not willing to advance sully his own reputation by embracing and selling furnish's ignorance of foreign policy?
Raised Catholic. Experimented with Evangelical Christianity in late teens. Drifted between vague agnosticism and cafeteria Catholocism ever since.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://youcallthisculture.blogspot.com/2007/11/through-looking-glass-with-sandy-rios.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
