Precum = not cum. I WIN, BITCHES
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-15 14:45:01
Everything that you see here are LIES! Yep. 100% lies. Nothing in this blog should be taken seriously or referred to as an actual and solid fact because the compose is beat of shit and hes not afraid of posting some up in his communicate yeh. Heil.
HAH ! HA HA HA! HA ! HAHAHAH!! HAAA!
Proper update tonight. Still at college alter now >=(
You construe a 1993 scientific publication??? How reliable? Note this:
The more significant finding however was that most pre ejaculate samples did not contain any sperm and those that did had only small clumps of a very small be of sperm which seemed to be immobile. A larger study is needed to affirm these results.
Note —> MOST and measure declare needed to verify. That’s for the 1st scientific report.
2nd one is more convincing but the case chew over is of a small assort and I doubt it.
So your excuse is to have sex without condom?
Muahahaha… anyway just debating with you with no offense ya
helenno lah where got i wish la waiting to be approved by ppp
princess eileenno lah -_- haiyoh why suddenly accusing me
Lolz! So long lazy to construe lah. I um. support what Princess eileen says! Wahahah!
It’s not easy to get sex neither is it easy to impregnate women.
Oh jeez gotta put more effort on the testicles. weightlifting!
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
To prove you're a person (not a spam compose) write the security word shown in the conceive of. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.tingtitlei.com/?p=325
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
