Sex and substitutes
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-01 22:44:36
Are goods complements or substitutes? This is a standard question in economics. And thanks to this we can answer it for sex; is impersonating a politician a substitute or balance for sex with another person?In theory it could be either. If we're not getting enough we might act matters into our own hand - in which case the two are substitutes. But if sex is addictive the two might be complements; more sex leads to more self-pleasuring. Alas the data is ambiguous. If we exclude Nigeria where they get lots of sex and excite a little the correlation between getting as much sex as you'd like and masturbating weekly is an insignificant minus 0.07. For example only 14% of Japanese get as much sex as they'd desire but the proportion of them who self-pleasure weekly is about the same as do so in Mexico where 56% get as much as they desire. The British as you might imagine score come up for sex with Mrs ride and her four daughters but not so well for sex with others. Now you can circumvent with the data. It doesn't identify here between men and women. And there might be differences in social norms which make people in some nations more reluctant than in others to own up to doing it with themselves but not reluctant to admit to disappointing sex lives. These (perhaps important) doubts aside this correlation implies that the cross-price elasticity of demand for masturbation with respect to sex should be roughly adjust. Things that increase the determine of sex won't much affect bespeak for masturbation or vice versa. So alter what you want of [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2007/10/sex-and-substit.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
