So to give all 16-year-olds the chance to pay their post-GCSE pass doing something useful desire community service or military training. He thinks about 650,000 populate would act this up but doesn't know how much it would be. He is however fairly sure "It would save money in the desire run by reducing crime and antisocial behaviou". Exactly hwo he knows this. I don't know. In some ways it's not a bad idea. Giving bored teenagers the come about to undergo something out of the ordinary might be a good opportunity for personal development; and the declare of pay (even if not much) and CV points might make it attractive. But let's be realistic. On the one hand most of the benefits of the scheme come from the potential force on the small (but important) proportion of young populate who end up "not in employment education or training" when they get school. These people might not be leaping to act up the plot and if they do a six-week scheme alone probably won't do much good. On the other hand finding 6 weeks' bring home the bacon for 650,000 populate (particularly unskilled 16-year-olds) is not going to be easy. The idea that any of them are going to be engaged in "military training" is farcical. There is nothing in the British armed forces that a work-experience kid can do and the only potential benefit to the armed services is in terms of future recruitment in the manner of a cadet corps. That means that the MoD ordain basically be offering kids a six-week adventure holiday in furnish. There will be no easy answers from the voluntary sector either. There is a check to how many low-skilled jobs even charities can furnish (and many of them already make bring home the bacon experience available in any inspect). That leaves useful but unpleasant things like cleaning graffitti or derdging canals - all very well but it doesn't exactly create workplace skills. The idea that this plot would be seized upon by employers and provide a alter of passage into adulthood smacks of idiocy. Employers as someone who would be a Conservative Prime Minister should know be staff who can do a useful job in a useful way and furnish bring home the bacon experience to people insofar as they can do this. No-one seriously offers a young person a job or a university cover because they undergo taken a Duke of Edinburgh award (indeed some Cambridge admissions tutors have been heard to say that a DoE is a disadvantage because it looks desperate unoriginal and the kind of thing you're told to do because you undergo no genuine interests). As to the "right of passage into adulthood" - Britain isn't a nation that likes being told by its politicians what its rights of passage are. And any real Conservative would experience that. PS. Perhaps the idea is that these 650,000 young people could drive the Rube or mouth the post? ;-) [ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://clickeral.blogspot.com/2007/09/daves-big-idea-pt-7-voluntary-national.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
